Friday, November 27, 2009

What's Faster: Radeon x1650 por AGP 512 or NVidia 7600 GT 256 AGP? Any better than my ATI 9800

Looking to use my current system for a couple of more years. Do not want to change MOBO. Current rig:



Intel Pentium 4 2.814MHz



Display Card



ATI RADEON 9800 PRO



Memory



1024MB



Operating System



Microsoft Windows XP Pro



What's Faster: Radeon x1650 por AGP 512 or NVidia 7600 GT 256 AGP? Any better than my ATI 9800 Pro?windows xp



if you do *not* plan to move to vista in the next two years, your choice clearly should go to the Nv 7600 ## on XP (only)## it way outperforms the X1650, even as XT.



if, however, you think about upgrading to vista once it matured some (give or take half a year), then your choice should go to the x1650;



the ATI X1000 serie support basic DirectX 10 features (which will be the only Dx available in vista) whereas Nvidia cards ('xcept for the 8800) do not.



What's Faster: Radeon x1650 por AGP 512 or NVidia 7600 GT 256 AGP? Any better than my ATI 9800 Pro?microsoft office 2007 internet explorerI have the exact same processor and memory amount. I overclcok the P4 to 3.2. I just sold my 9800 pro also. I just bought the 1650 on ebay for 79 plus 20 dollar rebate for a total of 59. I havent got it yet.. did you ever choose a vid card? let me know Report It


x1650 is way better



www.newegg.com
See Link. Seems to me that neither is best in the %26lt;锟?0 range. I prefer ATI cards myself but these new X cards seem to suck quite a bit. Nvidia all the way on that one but if your thinking up to 锟?0 check out the second link.



Regards EDD

No comments:

Post a Comment

 
military loans